AD ALTA
JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH
Table 3 Comparison of risk behavior according to level of the attachment to peers
attachment_to peers
FRR
SF
AB
DB
BUL
EHA
RB
weak
N
140
141
139
143
140
140
121
M
5,27
4,13
6,99
4,78
6,62
9,99
36,94
SEM
,268
,123
,440
,387
,495
,290
1,359
SD
3,166
1,465
5,191
4,632
5,861
3,434
14,948
average
N
529
550
522
545
537
539
459
M
4,76
3,77
6,57
3,38
3,90
8,96
31,20
SEM
,120
,064
,187
,153
,190
,152
,603
SD
2,760
1,491
4,278
3,573
4,405
3,531
12,911
strong
N
151
160
145
159
160
158
128
M
4,29
3,34
6,61
3,14
3,63
8,85
29,91
SEM
,252
,127
,354
,348
,351
,305
1,348
SD
3,093
1,606
4,261
4,389
4,441
3,829
15,251
F
4,161
10,407
,480
8,408
20,839
5,146
10,109
p
,016
< ,001
,619
< ,001
< ,001
,006
< ,001
Legend: N = frequency, M = mean, SEM = standard error of the mean, SD = standard deviation, F = value of ANOVA test, p = significance; FRR = family relations and rituals, SF =
school and friendship, AB = addictive behavior, DB = delinquent behavior, BUL = bullying, EHA = eating habits and activities, RB = total score of risk behavior
Legend: FRR = family relations and rituals, SF =
school and friendship, AB = addictive behavior, DB = delinquent behavior, BUL = bullying, EHA = eating habits and activities
Figure 1 Subscales of risk behavior according to level of the attachment to mother
Legend: FRR = family relations and rituals, SF =
school and friendship, AB = addictive behavior, DB = delinquent behavior, BUL = bullying, EHA = eating habits and activities
Figure 2 Subscales of risk behavior according to level of the attachment to father
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
FRR
SF
AB
DB
BUL
EHA
weak attachment
average attachment
strong attachment
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
FRR
SF
AB
DB
BUL
EHA
weak attachment
average attachment
strong attachment
- 31 -