AD ALTA
JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH
general. Every practicing teacher knows that it is the educational
competence that motivates students and develops their creativity
(30).
4 Conclusion
In this work, we have considered fifteen selected articles on this
topic, in particular the use of robots as auxiliary tools in higher
education. The potential benefits of these scientific papers were
analyzed. It was noted that robots are an effective tool to support
such subjects as programming, engineering, mechatronics,
microcontrollers and other areas of natural science. This type of
training significantly increases the students' motivation, develops
creative and computational thinking skills and forms key
competences.
It is revealed that project training is the best method when using
the Arduino platform, as the work takes place in a team and each
participant is responsible for the performance of its functions. In
the process of such work, the study of a certain area is
systematic; moreover, students receive as a result of their efforts
– the finished product.
A promising research is the systematization of methodological
and technical means of project-oriented training and the
development of an educational environment for teaching
programming the micro-robots.
Literature:
1. Radionov AA. 2011. Electrical equipment and automatics.
Moscow: Magnitogorsk.
2. Omelchenko EYa, Tanich VO et al. 2013. Brief overview and
prospects of the Arduino microprocessor platform application.
Electrotehnicheskie sistemy i kompleksi [Electrotechnical
systems and complexes], No 21. pp. 28-32.
3. Momot MV. 2017. Mobile robots on the basis of Arduino. St.
Petersburg: BHV-Peterburg.
4. Klyachenko DN. 2018, 14-15 February. Educational robotics:
from Lego to Arduino. Proceedings from: “Robotics and
education: school, university and production”. Perm.
5. Sytnikov PL. Proceedings from II International scientific and
practical conference: Education and Science in modern
conditions.
6. Gaisina IR. 2012. Robotics development in school area.
Proceedings from II International scientific conference:
Pedagogical skills. Moscow: Buki-Vedi.
7. Yurevich EI. 2005. Robotics basis. St. Petersburg: BHV-
Peterburg.
8. Chetina VV. 2017. Features of the introduction of robotics in
the educational process. Nauka i perspectivy [Science and
perspectives], No 2.
9. Ospennikova EV, Ershov MG. 2015. Educational robotics as
an innovative technology for the implementation of the
Polytechnic orientation of physics teaching in high school.
Pedagogicheskoe obrazhovanie v Rossii [Pedagogical education
in Russia], No 3. pp. 33 - 40.
10. Contemporary education: Robotics at school. Available at:
http://www.techno-guide.ru/robototekhnika/sovremennoe-
obrazovanie-robototekhnika-v-shkole.html
11. Maksimov VP, Kornilov Yu. 2015, 27 November. Analysis
of Single-Board computers potentially suitable for use in
teaching. Proceedings from VI International Scientific and
Practical Conference: Pedagogical skills and pedagogical
technologies. Cheboksary: CNS Interactive plus.
12. Ushanov KP. 2017. Laboratory course "Basics of
programming the Arduino": qualification of a robot Growing up.
state prof-PED. UN-t. Information systems and technologies.
Yekaterinburg.
13. Vlasova OS. 2013a. Technologies of educational robotics as
a means of development of the subject area "Mathematics and
Computer Studies». Nachalnaya shkola do i posle [Primary
school before and after], No 10.
14. Vlasova OS. 2013b. The content component of primary
school teacher training for the introduction of educational
robotics.
Vestnik
Chelyabinskogo
Gosudarstvennogo
pedagogicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk
State Pedagogical University], No 11. pp. 47-57.
15. Osadchyi VV, Osadchaya EP. 2014. Analysis of the problem
of professional training of the programmer and ways to solve it.
Obrazhovatelnie
tehnologii i obschestvo
[Educational
technologies and advocacy]. Tatarstan: FGBOU VPO KNITY,
Vol.17, No 3, pp. 362-377.
16. Ilyin IV, Ospennikova EV. 2012. Systematization and
generalization of measurement technical knowledge as part of
the implementation of the principle of Polytechnic in teaching
physics. European Social Science Journal, No 3.
17. Zhuev PV, Koscheeva ES. 2014. The problem of continuity
in studying robotics at school and university. Pedagogicheskoe
obrazhovanie v Rosii [Pedagogical Education in Russia], No 8.
pp. 54-61.
18. Biolchini J, Mian PG, Candida A, Cruz N, Guilherme HT.
2005. Systematic Review in Software Engineering, technical
report. Rio de Janeiro.
19. Antman EM, Lau J, Kupelnick B, Mosteller F, Chalmers I.
1992. A comparison of results of meta-analysis of randomized
control trials and recommendations of clinical experts.
Treatment for myoboardial infarction. JAMA, 268.
20. Lau J, Antman EM, Jimenez-Silva J, Kupelnick B, Mosteller
F, Chalmers I. 1992. Cumulative meta-analysis of therapeutic
trials for myoboardial infarction.
21. Ellis J, Mulligan I, Sacket DL. 1995. Inpatient general
medicine is evidence based. Lancet.
22. Last JM. 1988. International epidemiological Association A
dictionary of epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Feigin VL. 1999. Basics of meta-analysis: theory and
practice. Mezhdunarodniy zhyrnal medetsinskoi practiki
[International Journal of Medical Practice], No 7.
24. Newton S, Fabiane B, Vavassori B. 2017. Robotics
applications grounded in learning theories on tertiary education.
Computers & Education, No 112.
25. Miguel AR, Hierro CM, Perez A. 2013. Using Arduino to
enhance computer programming courses in science and
engineering. Proceedings from Conference: EDULEARN 13.
Barcelona, Spain.
26. Miguel AR, Rocio RZ, Manoso C, Angel P. 2015. Closing
the gender gap in an introductory programming course.
Computers & Education, No 82.
27. Ogrutan PL. 2017. Increasing Students’ Interest by
encouraging them to Create Original Lab Projects. TEM Journal,
Vol. 6 (4). ISSN 2217-8309, DOI: 10.18421.
28. Grover R, Shoba K, Shoup T, Khanbaghi M. 2014. A
Competition-Based Approach for Undergraduate Mechatronics
Education Using the Arduino Platform. Proceedings from:
Interdisciplinary Engineering Design Education Conference
(IEDEC).
29. Hurtuk J, Norbert A, Chovanec M. 2017. The Arduino
Platform Connected to Education Process. Proceedings from:
21st International Conference on Intelligent Engineering
Systems. Larnaca, Cyprus.
30. Venkova LE 2017. Competencies and project activities.
Pedagogicheskaya
masterskaya
[Pedagogical workshop].
Moscow.
31. Kitchenham B, Charters S. 2007. Guidelines for performing
Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. Keele
University, Durham University: Joint Report.
Primary Paper Section: I
Secondary Paper Section: IN
- 350 -