AD ALTA
JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH
The creation of complex teaching materials accessible via the
portal Moodle. The easy accessibility of the portal Moodle
(without any necessary expenditure) is the precondition for
further development of the experiment's focus and also for the
cooperation between the faculties exchanging of monitoring
information. The problem of very heterogeneous and ever
decreasing knowledge of university applicants, mostly from
mathematics, is a problem to face for the majority of Slovak
economic faculties in the very near future. The result of our
research can be the foundation for the cooperation between the
universities but also for the relationship between universities and
secondary schools. The results are usable for other subjects in
the future, wherever the development of a students' skills is
important for economic and trade practice. Because they require
the graduates' ability to work actively with the information in
any form, it suppresses the extent of memorisation of the
information taught. The benefit will also be the appearance of
publications which aggregate the individual theoretical and
experimental outputs of our research. Last but not least will be
the added bonus of the development of the student's self-
evaluation system, designed for their internal testing. The
student will be able to verify his/her extent of knowledge
individually by a simulation of the exam conditions.
Quantification of the process' effectivity will enable the teachers
to actively use IT support for the creation of all parts of the
pedagogical process. It will help them to eliminate ineffective
administrative activities and focus their attention on the
pedagogical process itself.
Literature:
1.
Anyakoha, C. 2018. Achieving sustainable development in
Nigeria via innovative education. The role of business
education. Acta Oeconomica Universitatis Selye 7 (1), 7 – 20
2.
Bajtoš J. (2006), Kompendium pedagogiky alebo state o
výchove. Košice, UPJŠ
3.
Buleca, J., Mura, L. 2014. Quantification of the efficiency of
public administration by data envelopment analysis. Procedia
Economics and Finance, 15, pp. 162-168.
4.
Clark, R. C., Mayer, R. E. (2016), E-learning and the
science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and
designers of multimedia learning. John Wiley & Sons.
5.
Dalziel, J. (2003), Implementing learning design: The
learning activity management system (LAMS).
6.
De Freitas, S., Oliver, M. (2005), Does E
‐learning Policy Drive
Change in Higher Education?: A case study relating models of
organisational change to e‐learning implementation. Journal of
Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(1), 81-96.
7.
Dziuban, C., Hartman, J., Moskal, P. (2004), Blended
learning. Educause Centre for Applied Research Bulletin.
8.
Eger, L, (2005), Technologie vzdělávání dospělých, Plzeň:
Západočeská univerzita v Plzni.
9.
Garrison, D. R., Kanuka, H. (2004), Blended learning:
Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The
internet and higher education, 7(2), 95-105.
10.
Graham, G. (2004). E-learning: a philosophical enquiry.
Education+ Training, 46(6/7), 308-314.
11.
Graham, C. R. (2006), Blended learning systems. The
handbook of blended learning, 3-21.
12.
Gutstein, E. (2003), Teaching and learning mathematics for
social justice in an urban, Latino school. Journal for Research in
Mathematics Education, 37-73.
13.
D. N. Harris. Value-Added Measures in Education: What
Every Educator Needs to Know. Harvard Education Press. 8
Story Street First Floor, Cambridge, MA 02138, 2011.
14.
Híc, P., & Pokorný, M. (2004). Vybrané problémy z teórie
grafov. Metodicko-pedagogické centrum v Bratislave.
15.
Higgins, S., et al. (2016). The Sutton Trust-Education
Endowment Foundation Teaching and Learning Toolkit.
16.
Horton, W. (2011), E-learning by design. John Wiley &
Sons.
17.
P. Kaclík, M. Kolková, L. Píš, J. Trajová. Modely pridanej
hodnoty vo vzdelávaní slovenských stredných škôl Slovak High
Schools Value-Added Models. In Forum Statisticum Slovacum ,
50-59, 2015.
18.
R. Krpec, M. Burda. Field of Study as a factor Influencing
The Model of Value–Added Assesment. Journal on Efficiency
and Responsibility in Education and Science, 64-76, 2011.
19.
Lewis, N. J., & Orton, P. Z. (2006). Blending learning for
business impact. The handbook of blended learning: Global
perspectives, local designs, 61.
20.
Loucks-Horsley, S., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., Hewson, P.
W. (Eds.). (2009), Designing professional development for
teachers of science and mathematics. Corwin Press.
21.
Mura, L., Daňová, M., Vavrek, R., Dúbravská, M. 2017.
Economic freedom – classification of its level and impact on the
economic security.AD ALTA-Journal of Interdisciplinary
Research, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 154 – 157. ISSN 1804-7890
22.
Orton, K., Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Jona, K., &
Wilensky, U. (2016). Bringing Computational Thinking Into
High School Mathematics and Science Classrooms.
Transforming Learning, Empowering Learners.
23.
Osguthorpe, R. T., Graham, C. R. (2003), Blended learning
environments: Definitions and directions. Quarterly Review of
Distance Education, 4(3), 227-33.
24.
Radu, L. D. 2018. Green ICT: some challenges and potential
solutions.Acta Oeconomica Universitatis Selye 7 (2), 141 – 150.
25.
J. Rogers, S. Vossoughi, S. Fanelli. Value Added? UCLA
IDEA. Los Angeles: UCLA IDEA, 2011.
26.
Rozsa, Z. 2018. Ghostwriting among business management
students. Acta Oeconomica Universitatis Selye 7 (2), 151 – 161
27.
Schroeder, R., Oakley, B. (2005), Adding clicks to bricks:
Increasing access to mainstream education. Elements of quality
online education: Engaging communities, 101-115.
28.
Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., Donovan, S. S. (1999), Effects
of small-group learning on undergraduates in science,
mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis.
Review of educational research, 69(1), 21-51.
29.
Turek, I. (1996). O materiálnych prostriedkoch
vyučovacieho procesu. Metodické centrum BB.
30.
Žuľová, J., Švec, M., Madleňák, A. (2018). Personality
aspects of the employee and their exploration from the GDPR
perspective. Central European Journal of Labour Law and
Personnel Management, 1 (1), 68 – 77. http://doi.org/1
0.33382/cejllpm.2018.01.05 ISSN 2644-4542
Primary Paper Section: A
Secondary Paper Section: AM
- 80 -